Showing posts with label Sociology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sociology. Show all posts

Saturday, September 18, 2021

Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion


DISMANTLING GLOBAL HINDUTVA CONFERENCE
10-12 September 2021







Friday, September 10
9:30 – 11:10 am EDT / 7:00 – 8:30 pm IST

What Is Global Hindutva

Opening Remarks: Gyan Prakash

Christophe Jaffrelot | Meena Kandasamy | Anand Patwardhan | Moderator: Thomas Blom Hansen

11:30 – 1:00 PM EDT / 9:00 – 10:30 pm IST

The Political Economy of Hindutva

Jens Lerche | Pritam Singh | Vamsi Vakulabharanam | Moderator: Smriti Rao

1:30 – 3:00 PM EDT / 11:00 – 12:30 am IST

Caste and Hindutva

Gajendran Ayyathurai | Meena Dhanda | Bhanwar Meghwanshi | Moderator: Rupa Viswanath

Saturday, September 11
9:30 – 11:00 am EDT / 7:00 – 8:30 pm IST

Gender and Sexual Politics of Hindutva

Leena Manimekalai | Akanksha Mehta | P. Sivakami | Moderator: Paola Bacchetta

11:30 – 1:00 PM EDT / 9:00 – 10:30 pm IST

Contours of the Nation

Mohamad Junaid | Arkotong Longkumer | Yasmin Saikia | Nandini Sundar | Moderator: Suchitra Vijayan

1:30 – 3:00 PM EDT / 11:00 – 12:30 am IST

Hindutva, Science, and Healthcare

Meera Nanda | Kavita Sivaramakrishnan | Banu Subramaniam | Moderator: Joseph Alter

Sunday, September 12
9:30 – 11:00 am EDT / 7:00 – 8:30 pm IST

Hindutva Propaganda and the Digital Ecosystem

Cyril Sam | FCHS* Member | Salil Tripathi | Moderator: Rohit Chopra

11:30 – 1:10 PM EDT / 9:00 – 10:40 pm IST

Hinduism and Hindutva

Opening Remarks: T. M. Krishna

Raja Bhattar | FCHS* Members | Brij Maharaj | Sunita Viswanath | Moderator: Balmurli Natrajan

1:30 – 3:00 PM EDT / 11:00 – 12:30 am IST: Islamophobia, White Supremacy, and Hindutva

Anjali Arondekar | Demetrius Eudell | Deepa Kumar | Moderator: Manan Ahmed

*FCHS = Feminist Critical Hindu Studies Collective

Ad-Hoc Organizing Committee


Sahar Aziz, Rutgers University

Ben C. Baer, Princeton University

Sruti Bala, University of Amsterdam

Laura Brueck, Northwestern University

Ananya Chakravarti, Georgetown University

Zahid R. Chaudhary, Princeton University

Rohit Chopra, Santa Clara University

Ashley Cohen, University of Southern California

Meena Dhanda, University of Wolverhampton

John Esposito, Georgetown University

Shubhra Gururani, York University

Jyotsna Kapur, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale

David Ludden, New York University

Radhika Mongia, York University

Meera Nanda, IISER Pune (former Visiting Faculty)

Gyan Prakash, Princeton University

Sharmila Rudrappa, South Asia Institute, University of Texas-Austin

Lotika Singha, University of Wolverhampton

Suchitra Vijayan, Author and Barrister-at-Law

Feminist Critical Hindu Studies Collective


Tweet on 12 September 2021
Narayana Rao
@knoltweet·

If we are in discussion and if the issues are relevant we need to bring them into discussion. Hindutva is about the unity and integrity of Hindustan. How you can promote it,  is its thesis. It is based on region and not religion.  There can be other theses. 
@vishwa_samvad  #dgh



Research Anthology on Religious Impacts on Society

Management Association, Information Resources
IGI Global, 21-Jul-2020 - Social Science - 825 pages

Religion is considered by many to be something of the past, but it has a lasting hold in society and influences people across many cultures. This integration of spirituality causes numerous impacts across various aspects of modern life. The variety of religious institutions in modern society necessitates a focus on diversity and inclusiveness in the interactions between organizations of different religions, cultures, and viewpoints.

Research Anthology on Religious Impacts on Society examines the cultural, sociological, economic, and philosophical effects of religion on modern society and human behavior. Highlighting a range of topics such as religious values, social reforms, and spirituality, this publication is an ideal reference source for religious officials, church leaders, psychologists, sociologists, professionals, researchers, academicians, and students.



Volume 16 - Ralph L. Piedmont - 2005 - Book Information

Google Book Link
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=pCkGD_RcbEEC


Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (RSSSR) publishes reports of innovative studies that pertain empirically or theoretically to the scientific study of religion, including spirituality, regardless of their academic discipline or professional orientation.

The articles included in this volume report studies on the role of religion and spirituality in relationship to many topics of current popular interest, among them well-being, self-esteem, emotional intelligence, substance abuse, social mobility, positive psychology, coping with medical decision making, and images of God.

Ralph L. Piedmont is Psychologist at the Department of Pastoral Counseling, Loyola College in Maryland, Columbia, USA. One of his publications is The Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Clinical and Research Applications (Plenum Press, 1998).

Table of contents

Christian Belief About the Bible and the Holy Spirit in Relation to Psychological Type.
Andrew Village

Monastic Spirituality Beyond the Cloister: A Preliminary Look at Lay Cistercians.
William L. Smith

Relationships Between Spiritual Transcendence and Emotional Intelligence Among Older Catholic Nuns.
Ann Billard, Joanne M. Greer, Mary Ellen Merrick, William Sneck, S.J., and N. J. Scheers

A Comparison of Religiosity Between European-Americans, African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans and Asian-Americans.
George Yancey

God Images and Self-Esteem: A Study Among 11-18 Year-olds.
Leslie J. Francis

Charismatic Experience and Emotional Stability: A Study Among Adult Christians.
Leslie J. Francis and Susan H. Jones

Social Mobility and Religion: Evidence From Lebanon.
Marianne El Khoury and Ugo Panizza

Hope, Optimism, Pessimism, and Spirituality as Predictors of Well-Being Controlling for Personality
Joseph W. Ciarrocchi and Erin Deneke

Parental Rejection and Religiosity: Differential Predictors of Mood and Substance Use.
John J. Cecero and Adam L. Fried

Is a Consensus Definition of Spirituality Possible? Theory Construction in Spiritually-Oriented Psychotherapy.
Len Sperry

Religious Coping and Mental Health Outcomes in Family Members Making DNR Decisions.
Johanna R. Sood, Celia B. Fisher, and Daniel P. Sulmasy

Spirituality, Religious Commitment, and Psychological Well-being
Stephen A. Price and Lawrence G. Herringer

Spiritual Transcendence as an Unmediated Causal Predictor of Psychological Growth and Worldview Among Filipinos
Gabriel S. Dy-Liacco, M. Christine Kennedy, Donna J. Parker, and Ralph L. Piedmont

Spirituality as “Feeling Connected with the Transcendent:” Outline of a Transpersonal Psychology of Adult Development of Self.
Jan Sinnott

http://www.brill.com/research-social-scientific-study-religion-volume-16

Details of other volume are also there in the website and they have to be collected.





Ud 19.9.2021, 12.9.2021
Pub 29 August 2014

Sunday, September 12, 2021

Hindutva - An Exploration

Earlier Collection

Hindutva - A Collection of Articles and Ideas

http://guide-india.blogspot.com/2013/09/hindutva.html


Swami Dayananda Saraswati

"He was the first to give the call for Swarajya as "India for Indians" – in 1876. It was later taken up by Lokmanya Tilak."

Even Congress party acknowledges it. 

FaceBook Post by Indian National Congress
February   12,  2020  · 

"Dayananda Saraswati was an Indian philosopher, social leader and founder of the Arya Samaj, a reform movement of the Vedic Dharma. He was the first to give the call for Swaraj as "India for Indians" in 1876. We honour his contributions to our Nation today."
https://www.facebook.com/IndianNationalCongress/photos/dayananda-saraswati-was-an-indian-philosopher-social-leader-and-founder-of-the-a/2783080651804589/

"India for Indians"  - "Hindustan for Hindus" - Is there any difference?

Indostan and Hindustan both are same.   Indian and Hindu both are same.

1908

Hind Swaraj - Independence for India - M.K. Gandhi

Mahatma Gandhi on Independence for India - 1908 Publication

https://guide-india.blogspot.com/2012/03/hind-swaraj-independence-for-india-mk.html


Ram Prasad Bismil - Hindustan  Republican Association

Desh par marr jayenge

Marte marte desh ko

zinda magar kar jayenge”


Ram Prasad Bismil was one of the most notable Indian revolutionaries who fought British colonialism with a desire for freedom and revolutionary spirit reverberating in every inch of his body and poetry. Bismil, who was born in 1897, was a respected member of the Hindustan Republican Association alongside Sukhdev. He was also a participant in the infamous Kakori train heist, for which the British government condemned him to death.

Born: 11 June 1897, Shahjahanpur

Died: 19 December 1927, Gorakhpur Jail, Gorakhpur

Cause of death: Execution by hanging

Organization: Hindustan  Republican Association


https://leverageedu.com/blog/indian-freedom-fighters/

Chandra Shekhar Azad

Chandra Shekhar Azad, born in 1906, was a close companion of Bhagat Singh in the independence movement. He was also a member of the Hindustan Republican Association. He was  the bravest and daring Indian freedom fighters against the British authorities. After murdering several opponents during a battle with British forces, he shot himself with his Colt pistol. He promised he’d never be caught alive by the British. He reorganized  the Hindustan Republican Association as  the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association


Born: 23 July 1906, Bhavra

Died: 27 February 1931, Chandrashekhar Azad Park

Full name: Chandrashekhar Tiwari

Education: Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith

https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1640655


1921-1922

Hindutva by V.D. Savarkar

http://library.bjp.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/284/3/essentials_of_hindutva.v001.pdf


Why Savarkar wrote this essay? To clarify the position of Hindu Mahasabha on whom it is representing?



https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095937609


Hindutva 101 by Sadhana.Org



Difficult, but important.

Talking about complex political, historical, and religious issues may seem intimidating, especially for those of us who have grown up outside India. Nevertheless, it is our responsibility to speak up. This guide is intended for Hindu-Americans who may want to talk to their parents, relatives, friends, or colleagues about Hindu nationalism but don’t know where to start. It will give an overview of Hindutva from a Hindu perspective and then provide some links we have collected that address the issue thoughtfully.



July 17th, 2018

“I don’t believe that Hindutva is Hinduism” – Dr Shashi Tharoor.

Dr Shashi Tharoor was recently in the UK to promote his new book  Why I am a Hindu.

Anishka Gheewala Lohiya had the opportunity to talk to Dr Tharoor at LSE about the relationship between politics and religion in India.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2018/07/17/i-dont-believe-that-hindutva-is-hinduism-dr-shashi-tharoor/


Hindutva

M. G. Chitkara

APH Publishing, 1997 - Hinduism - 303 pages

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=zqkBNr4U7cwC

The book is interesting to read.


Page 4: By middle of the 14th century, the work Hindu acquired prestige in the writings of various poets.  Padmanabha uses the word Hindu to glorify Chauhans of Jalore in his epic poem (1455 AD), Kanhadade Prabhandha.

Hindutva, Ideology, and Politics

A. A. Parvathy

Deep and Deep Publications, 2003

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=RpaEt8npT0sC



Uproot Hindutva: The Fiery Voice of the Liberation Panthers

Thirumaavalavan

Popular Prakashan, 2004 - Dalits - 248 pages

Thirumaavalavan analyses the various roles of Hindutva (ideology of the Hindu right] in sustaining the hegemony of the caste system. He speaks provocatively of the need to counter Hindutva with a Tamil identity that can reach beyond its region to other oppressed peoples. He speaks of Eelam -- the cause of the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka -- of the refusal to be Hindu and of the right to conversion, of women's rights, of the heritage of the dalits, of the need to follow the guidelines of the dalit reformer, Dr B R Ambedkar, among other issues. Always unflinchingly honest and hard-hitting, the collection reveals new currents in Dalit politics.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HfNRO-LtsN4C


The Era of Hindutva, Right’s might and increasing fascism

Arshdeep

Jan 1, 2020


Year 2011

UPA is in power and India is fed up of the immensely corrupt people in power. And people who resonated with Anna Hazare decided to launch Anti-Corruption Movement.

This movement was one of the main reasons why UPA goverment and the mainstream LEFT-WING will fall on its knees by securing only 59 seats out of total 543 seats in next elections and it will indicate how desperate were the people for a change.

 BJS subsequently reorganised itself as the BJP under the leadership of Vajpayee, Lal Krishan Advani, and Murali Manohar Joshi. BJP advocated hindutva (“Hindu-ness”), an ideology that sought to define Indian culture in terms of Hindu values, and it was highly critical of the policies and practices that should be of a secular nation.

The term “Hindutva” was promoted by Indian freedom movement activist Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (also called Vir Savarkar). He wrote Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu? (1923), coining the term Hindutva. Savarkar  wasn’t really setting out to create a Hindu nation. India was, he asserted, a nation,  based on hindu-ness in an organic sense.


“BJP governments at the state and federal level are altering Indian history textbooks to conform with Hindu nationalist doctrine.” (What is Hindu nationalist doctrine?)

For some time it has been made pretty clear by different BJP party members, Hindu Rashtra is what they demand and will go to any extent to achieve this dream of theirs.


Hindutva and Dalits: Perspectives for Understanding Communal Praxis

Anand Teltumbde

SAGE Publishing India, 31-Jan-2020 - Social Science - 384 pages

Despite the teachings of Babasaheb Ambedkar against Hinduism and its pernicious caste system, which he forsook to become a Buddhist, many Dalits have turned to Hindutva. The RSS under Balasaheb Deoras began to appropriate Ambedkar, engaging with Dalits and Adivasis, Hinduizing their beliefs, providing social welfare and binding them in a political alliance.


Hindutva and Dalits: Perspectives for Understanding Communal Praxis takes a comprehensive view of the birth and growth of the Hindutva movement and its specific impact on Dalits. Part I, Theoretical Perspectives, explores the attitude of Hindutva vis-à-vis Dalits in its various manifestations. Part II, Hindutva in Operation, covers empirical evidence of its impact on Dalits. The contributors, distinguished scholar-activists, offer a provocative analysis on why both Dalits and Adivasis are drawn to Hindutva.


As analysed by Tanika Sarkar in her incisive Foreword, Hindutva’s hegemonic agenda lets ‘subalterns develop a stake in their own subordination, ... not in resignation or despair but in eager self-identification with it’. The great strength of this collection is that it asks difficult questions that need to be asked and yet have no easy answers. The book, thus, makes an invaluable contribution to the debate and takes it forward.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HhvHDwAAQBAJ



Hindutva as a variant of right-wing extremism

Eviane Leidig

Patterns of Prejudice 

Volume 54, 2020 - Issue 3, Pages 215-237 


Our one supreme goal is to bring to life the all-round glory and greatness of our Hindu Rashtra. [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, ‘Mission’]

Quoted in Thomas A. Howard, ‘Hindu nationalism against religious pluralism—or, the sacralization of religious identity and its discontents in present-day India’, in Kaye V. Cook (ed.), Faith in a Pluralist Age (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books 2018), 62–78 (67).


The only positive thing about the Hindu right wing is that they dominate the streets. They do not tolerate the current injustice and often riot and attack Muslims when things get out of control, usually after the Muslims disrespect and degrade Hinduism too much … India will continue to wither and die unless the Indian nationalists consolidate properly and strike to win. It is essential that the European and Indian resistance movements learn from each other and cooperate as much as possible. Our goals are more or less identical. [Anders Behring Breivik, ‘2083: A European Declaration of Independence’]

Andrew Berwick [pseud., i.e. Anders Behring Breivik], ‘2083: A European declaration of independence’, 1475, available on the Public Intelligence website at https://info.publicintelligence.net/AndersBehringBreivikManifesto.pdf (viewed 28 May 2020).

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0031322X.2020.1759861

Neo-Hindutva: Evolving Forms, Spaces, and Expressions of Hindu Nationalism

Edward Anderson, Arkotong Longkumer

Routledge, 21-May-2020 - Social Science - 156 pages

Neo-Hindutva explores the recent proliferation and evolution of Hindu nationalism – the assertive majoritarian, right-wing ideology that is transforming contemporary India.


This volume develops and expands on the idea of ‘neo-Hindutva’ –– Hindu nationalist ideology which is evolving and shifting in new, surprising, and significant ways, requiring a reassessment and reframing of prevailing understandings. The contributors identify and explain the ways in which Hindu nationalism increasingly permeates into new spaces: organisational, territorial, conceptual, rhetorical. The scope of the chapters reflect the diversity of contemporary Hindutva – both in India and beyond – which appears simultaneously brazen but concealed, nebulous and mainstreamed, militant yet normalised. They cover a wide range of topics and places in which one can locate new forms of Hindu nationalism: courts of law, the Northeast, the diaspora, Adivasi (tribal) communities, a powerful yoga guru, and the Internet. The volume also includes an in-depth interview with Christophe Jaffrelot and a postscript by Deepa Reddy.


Helping readers to make sense of contemporary Hindutva, Neo-Hindutva is ideal for scholars of India, Hinduism, Nationalism, and Asian Studies more generally. This book was originally published as a special issue of Contemporary South Asia.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=I2nnDwAAQBAJ


PUBLICATION -The politics of Hindutva in India - Routledge

November 2020

https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/2020/hindutva-politics-india



Cultural Entrenchment of Hindutva: Local Mediations and Forms of Convergence

Daniela Berti, Nicolas Jaoul, Pralay Kanungo

Taylor & Francis, 29-Nov-2020 - History - 358 pages


The book reflects on the discreet influence of Hindutva in situations/places outside or at the margins of its organisational and mobilisational arena, where people denying any commitment to the Sangh Parivar, incidentally, show affinities and parallelisms with its discourse and practice. This study looks at Hindutva’s entrenchment not so much as an orchestration from above but more as an outcome of a process that evolves in relation to specific social and cultural milieus.


The contributors analyse Hindutva’s entrenchment, emphasising on the ethnography of the forms of mediation and/or convergence produced in certain contexts. The 11 case studies highlight three different dynamics of Hindutva’s cultural entrenchment. The first section gathers cases where RSS-affiliated organisations have set up specific cultural or artistic programmes at the regional level, involving the meditation of local people whose interest in these programmes does not necessarily mean that they endorse the Hindutva agenda completely. The next deals with convergence and refers to cases where the followers gather around a charismatic personality, whose precepts and practice may bring them towards a closer affinity with the Hindutva programme. The last section deals with the contexts of resistance, where social milieus engaged in opposing Hindutva may, in fact, paradoxically, and even inadvertently, imbibe some of its ideas and practices in order to contest its claims.




The Eternal Hindu Rashtra

Dr Manmohan Vaidya
DR MANMOHAN VAIDYA
Sep 07, 2021

As per Hindu thought, ‘Rashtra’ means people. It also includes their mindset, attitude towards life, relationship with nature and the universe, approach towards history and tradition etc. In short, all things that form and impact the entire society. 

Is India a Nation? 
(Has any body questioned it earlier?)
[Winston Churchill once very famously remarked, “India is as much a nation as the equator is a place”. 
[IN A speech to London’s Constitutional Club in 1931, Winston Churchill poured scorn on the idea of India. “India is a geographical term. It is no more a united nation than the equator,” he spat, a slur that invites such uniform disagreement from Indians as to disprove itself. Less well known, but more worthy of debate, is the previous line of Churchill’s speech: “India is no more a political personality than Europe,” he contended. Banyan
Is India a country or a continent? The Economist,   Feb 11th 2017 Asia edition, https://www.economist.com/asia/2017/02/09/is-india-a-country-or-a-continent]
[ The boundaries of ‘here’, the nation, are continually constructed and contested but they are somewhat stable at any given time. India is anomalous in this regard because our nation contains multitudes. Built on imperial foundations, our nationalist conceit was to break the European mould and forge a nation out of an empire unified not by blood and soil but by ideas of freedom, self-reliance, social justice, and mutual respect for different faiths and cultures.

The vastness and diversity of the British Indian Empire meant that any nation emerging from it could not possibly claim any cultural unity; facts dictated that if the entity called India were to be a nation, it had to be a civic one rather than an ethnic one. Notwithstanding the horrors of Partition, turning a multitudinous empire into India was a singular achievement.  Anush Kapadia in EMPIRE NATION PART 1: HOW INDIA’S INTERNAL DIVISION OF LABOUR IS COLONIAL AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT
APRIL 23, 2020TALKING POLICYEMPIRE, IMPERIALISM, ISI,  https://www.cps.iitb.ac.in/empire-nation-part-1/ ]



All the people living on this great land of Bharat, from the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean, despite having diverse languages, castes, deities, ways of worship, food habits, costumes, etc, have the same approach towards life, ideals, nature, society and entire humanity. For thousands of years this approach has been cultivated and practiced as a culture that binds the society together. This bonding makes it a ‘Rashtra’. The main reason for inherent unity expressed in diversity forms the spirituality-based integral and holistic worldview that is the hallmark of Bharat and Bharatiyta. 

Bharatiyas believe in "Ishavasyam Idam Sarvam", which means everything animate or inanimate that is within the universe is the manifestation of the same Spirit (Chaitanya). 

Thus, the fundamental disconnect between the Western and Bharatiya thought is that while the former strives for ‘all are one’, the later organically believes in ‘all is one’.

'RSS Used Digital Tech to Adapt': Jaffrelot at Dismantling Global Hindutva Event

According to French Political Scientist Christophe Jaffrelot, the RSS used digital techniques to their advantage.


THE QUINT

Published: 11 Sep 2021, 9:05 AM IST

https://www.thequint.com/news/dismantling-global-hindutva-multidisciplinary-perspectives-dgh-a-three-day-global-scholarly-conference-begins#read-more

Anand Patwardhan: If Hindutva is Hinduism then the Ku Klux Klan is Christianity

The filmmaker’s speech at the Dismantling Global Hindutva conference being held from September 10-September 12.

12 Sep 2021

https://scroll.in/article/1005159/anand-patwardhan-if-hindutva-is-hinduism-then-the-ku-klux-klan-is-christianity













Friday, January 24, 2020

Max Weber's Theory - IAS Sociology Study Notes

Max Weber - Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism.

I recently read a book on Sociology Thinkers. I read one long back.


Video starts after 2 minutes.
_______________

_______________

Thursday, January 23, 2020

Sociology as Science - Research Methods and Analysis - IAS Sociology Notes



UPSC Civil Services
Paper I - Topics 2 & 3

2. Sociology as Science:

Science, scientific method and critique.
Major theoretical strands of research methodology.
Positivism and its critique.
Fact value and objectivity.
Non- positivist methodologies.

3.  Research Methods and Analysis:

Research Methods and Analysis:
Qualitative and quantitative methods.
Techniques of data collection.
Variables, sampling, hypothesis, reliability and validity.


Notes

2. Sociology as Science:

Science, scientific method and critique.
Major theoretical strands of research methodology.
Positivism and its critique.
Fact value and objectivity.

Non- positivist methodologies.

Phenomenology - Explanation by Karin Klenke

3.  Research Methods and Analysis:

Research Methods and Analysis:
Qualitative and quantitative methods.
Techniques of data collection.
Variables, sampling, hypothesis, reliability and validity.



Sociology Research Methodology and Methods
________________


________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rrny0sq2gWw

Channel cec  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA7OQkX9AEIVQ6j9i0OSQhA

Sociology - IAS Mains Syllabus and Study Materials



Anu Kumari - 2017 All India Rank 2 explains how to prepare for Sociology

Mainly in Hindi

She did a lot of reading. She is from science background. But did well in Sociology.
______________

______________


Sociology – Main Syllabus
Paper – I
FUNDAMENTALS OF SOCIOLOGY



1. Sociology - The Discipline

Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology.
Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences.
Sociology and common sense.


2. Sociology as Science:

Science, scientific method and critique.
Major theoretical strands of research methodology.
Positivism and its critique.
Fact value and objectivity.
Non- positivist methodologies.


Research Methods and Analysis:
Qualitative and quantitative methods.
Techniques of data collection.
Variables, sampling, hypothesis, reliability and validity.


4. Sociological Thinkers:

Karl Marx- Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle.
Emile Durkheim- Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society.
Max Weber- Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism.
Talcolt Parsons- Social system, pattern variables.
Robert K. Merton- Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups.
Mead - Self and identity.


5. Stratification and Mobility:
Concepts- equality, inequality, hierarchy, exclusion, poverty and deprivation.
Theories of social stratification- Structural functionalist theory, Marxist theory, Weberian theory.
Dimensions – Social stratification of class, status groups, gender, ethnicity and race.
Social mobility- open and closed systems, types of mobility, sources and causes of mobility.


6. Works and Economic Life:
Social organization of work in different types of society- slave society, feudal society, industrial /capitalist society.
Formal and informal organization of work.
Labour and society.


7. Politics and Society:
Sociological theories of power.
Power elite, bureaucracy, pressure groups, and political parties.
Nation, state, citizenship, democracy, civil society, ideology.
Protest, agitation, social movements, collective action, revolution.


8. Religion and Society:
Sociological theories of religion.
Types of religious practices: animism, monism, pluralism, sects, cults.
Religion in modern society: religion and science, secularization, religious revivalism, fundamentalism.



9. Systems of Kinship:
Family, household, marriage.
Types and forms of family.
Lineage and descent.
Patriarchy and sexual division oflabour.
Contemporary trends.


10. Social Change in Modern Society:
Sociological theories of social change.
Development and dependency.
Agents of social change.
Education and social change.
Science, technology and social change.


Paper - II: Sociology Syllabus


1 INDIAN SOCIETY: STRUCTURE AND CHANGE A. Introducing Indian Society:

(i) Perspectives on the study of Indian society:
Indology (GS. Ghurye).
Structural functionalism (M N Srinivas).
Marxist sociology (A R Desai).


(ii) Impact of colonial rule on Indian society :
Social background of Indian nationalism.
Modernization of Indian tradition.
Protests and movements during the colonial period.
Social reforms.

B. Social Structure:

(i) Rural and Agrarian Social Structure:
The idea of Indian village and village studies.
Agrarian social structure - evolution of land tenure system, land reforms.

(ii) Caste System:
Perspectives on the study of caste systems: GS Ghurye, M N Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille.
Features of caste system.
Untouchability - forms and perspectives.

(iii) Tribal communities in India:
Definitional problems.
Geographical spread.
Colonial policies and tribes.
Issues of integration and autonomy.


(iv) Social Classes in India:
Agrarian class structure.
Industrial class structure.
Middle classes in India.


(v) Systems of Kinship in India:
Lineage and descent in India.
Types of kinship systems.
Family and marriage in India.
Household dimensions of the family.
.
(vi) Religion and Society:
Religious communities in India.
Problems of religious minorities.
Patriarchy, entitlements and sexual division of labour


https://www.civilserviceindia.com/subject/Sociology/notes/index.html


https://www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Free-Study-Material/Sociology/

Akshat Kaushal - Paper 1

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nnnrQNaMFyIeXnhUW7M8nX9rvtNR3UoA/view

Links to Sociology Notes for IAS
https://reliableandvalid.com/2018/09/08/handmade-notes-of-upsc-sociology-toppers/

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Sociology - Bulletin - Information Board



2019

Scientists Create Global Map of Labor Flow
Aug 5, 2019 by News Staff 
A team of scientists from Indiana University and the professional network LinkedIn has created the first global map of labor flow.
http://www.sci-news.com/othersciences/sociology/global-labor-flow-map-07460.html


Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology
We are pleased to announce the Call for Participation for the 2019 Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology Annual Meeting
The Profession of Sociological Practice
October 17-19 in Portland, Oregon
https://www.aacsnet.net/


Book: Sociology (Boundless)  - Free Online
Last updatedJun 23, 2019
https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Sociology/Book%3A_Sociology_(Boundless)


Back to the Shop Floor: Behavioural Insights from Workplace Sociology
Andrew Pendleton, Ben Lupton, Andrew Rowe,
First Published May 29, 2019 Research Article
Full article view
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0950017019847940

Sociology of Industry - Industrial Sociology - Books - Bibliography



INDUSTRIAL SOCIOLOGY

Narendar SINGH
2012
Tata McGraw-Hill Education

This book attempts to show the theories illuminate present Industrial Sociological problems by introducing contemporary thinkers and their research. This book is strictly as per the recommended by UGC Committee of curriculum development as most universities are adopting the same. Industrial Sociology is a sub field of Sociology as per UGC. It is part of the curriculum of sociology. The Syllabus as recommended for Under Graduate and Post Graduate courses.
https://books.google.co.in/books/about/INDUSTRIAL_SOCIOLOGY.html?id=NeD2W2zuTXoC

Sunday, October 6, 2019

Karl Mannheim - Contribution to Sociology




The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim
Volker Meja, David Kettler

Anthem Press, 15-Dec-2017 - Social Science - 234 pages

“The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim” helps us to accompany him in his open, experimental thinking, the generation of new questions, the recognition of thought experiments as well as the care for controlling evidence, and his negotiations with colleagues he encounters in his own searches.
He is justly honored as a sociologist of repute. Sociology of knowledge is a project, not a creed; and “Ideology and Utopia” is a documentation, not a scripture.

“The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim” offers fresh commentaries and explorations by an international and presently active group of scholars. As the institutionalized understanding of Mannheim’s sociology of knowledge project was so long shaped by the synthetic reading by the American sociologist Robert K. Merton—a reputed sociologist  in his own right––the companion opens with a careful exposition and critique of that authoritative interpretation. It is followed by a close reading of the considerations that led Mannheim to move beyond the neo-Kantian epistemology of his earlier training to the project of a sociological understanding of critical knowledge. Next to come is a series of studies that marked by perspectives derived from intellectual strategies developed since the breakdown of consensus on the approaches examined in the previous section. In their variety, the studies capture a number of perspectives opened up or expanded by an understanding of Mannheim’s undertaking. The key terms are familiar: self-reflexivity, praxeological sociology, neo-realism, and dramatistic readings of world-views. The angles of vision differ, but they agree in projecting new and important light on Mannheim’s efforts. At the end, attention is focused on some unfamiliar links between Mannheim’s work and current interests: a study of Mannheim’s influence on Hannah Arendt, who knew him as teacher in Heidelberg and Frankfurt; an inquiry into Mannheim’s political thought from the standpoint of contemporary democratic political theory; and an examination of Mannheim’s attention to the status of women and of the work done on these matters under his tutelage by a group of talented women students.

The aim  of “The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim”  is to learn from Karl Mannheim.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZvtIDwAAQBAJ


Karl Mannheim is included in Sociological Thought Book, ny Francis Abraham and JOhn Henry Morgan, 1985.

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Auguste Comte - Sociology



In the religion of humanity, "Live for Others" will be the supreme commandment, Love its major principle, Order its basis and Progress its aim.  - Auguste Comte. Mentioned in Page 18 of Sociological Thought: From Comte to Sorokin, by Francis Abraham and John Henry Morgan, Macmillan India, New Delhi, 1985.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Political Sociology - Introduction


Article needs good amount of further modification and development.


Focus Areas of Political Sociology


Two distinct areas of focus are there in political sociology. One area is concerned with the social basis of power in all institutional sectors of society. In this line of enquiry, the social stratification is studied for its role in organized politics. The second area focuses on the organizational analysis of political groups and political leadership. This focus gives rise to the study of both formal and informal party organization, and  its linkages to the governmental bureaucracy, the legal system, interest groups, and the electorate at large. This approach is termed as institutional or organizational point of view in political sociology.

Social Stratification and Emergence of Political System and the Group Holding Power - Karl Marx


Karl Marx's conclusion is that social stratification is the result of  the social relations generated by the mode of production. It is Marx’s view that the political system derives from the pattern of social stratification.

Political scientists and sociologists pointed out that Marx's theory  fails to consider the consequences of differing types of political institutions on societal change. It does not study the role of individuals and groups in developing appropriate political institutions and their durability or longevity.

Distinct Political System and Institutions - Max Weber


As a sociologist, Weber agreed with Marx, that social structure as a basis for analyzing politics. But according to Weber, social stratification is the result of economic position and social status—prestige and honor. In his essay “Class, Status, Party” (1921), Weber postulated that there is a historical process going on that separating political institutions from economic and social structure. Political institutions are therefore worthy of direct sociological inquiry as an independent source of societal change.


Social Stratification and Political System - Further Development

The social stratification based political system theory  has seen the emergence  “interest group” theories. Political competition and conflict reflects the demands of specific interest groups—economic, professional, organizational, and even ethnic–religious. The governmental bureaucracy and the political parties have emerged as new strata and there are also now elements in the theory of interest groups.

At the empirical level, studies derived from a social stratification theory of politics have been characterized by a progressive refinement of categories of analysis based on more refined measures of social status. Based on analysis of voting statistics and sample surveys, political party affiliation and voting behavior of the electorate is clustered to find differences in political behavior of social strata. In the multiple-party election systems prevalent in large number of countries, sample surveys have been utilized to describe voting behavior in terms of such variables as occupation, income, education, status, ethnicity, and religion. Empirical work has been done on the relevance of personality and social-psychological variables for understanding voting patterns. But, these empirical researches are limited to  election decisions. Still,  they have not probed issues like party membership and funding, which are also important political outcome variables.

The empirical studies have supported the view that advanced industrialism produces a “middle-majority” politics. “Middle-majority politics” implies the decline of clearly identified working and middle classes with working class as the dominant or majority group and the emergence of a less differentiated social group. The gap between the working class and the middle class is declining, and the political process is developing into  pragmatic bargaining over specific issues instead of straight class conflict (Lipset, 1960).  These stratification theories give less emphasis to the impact of foreign affairs on the political orientations of the electorate.

Systematic research into political opinion gives deeper meaning to studies of political behavior and political participation. The techniques of opinion measurement enables the measurement of the attitude structure existing in the relevant society group toward specific political issues, political candidates, and political institutions. These studies focus on the detailed identification of those parts of the social structure which are characterized as active political orientation, absence of political orientation, weak political orientation, politically active in only to very specific interests and issues etc. Political apathy has been found to be concentrated in lower-income groups and  it is wide spread even in other higher  income groups and even in people with high levels of educational attainment. In one sense, these findings drive home the point that man is not a political animal, a view that  has long been recognized as valid by most political leaders as well as religious leaders.

The concept of alienation, focuses on understanding the social and psychological processes which produce a withdrawal or disengagement from political interest and political participation. Political apathy appears to  include both alienation and socially inherited disinterest in politics. Available research highlights the social groups particularly vulnerable to alienation, such as youth, minorities, and intellectuals. Some studies point out that alienation and apathy is not a “steady state” but an orientation which can gradually or suddenly be reversed and produce direct intervention in political process in the form of protest movements. Some new political groups emerge out of these protest movements.

The opinion measurement leads to the identification and analysis of popular ideologies.  Political “Ideology” is a comprehensive, rigidly held, and explicit political belief system or “world view.”


“Political socialization” refers  to the process of internalization of political values, including the impact of the family and educational institutions. Under conditions of rapid social change, the relevance of initial socialization variables in explaining mass political perspectives must be amplified by an understanding of the impact of education and involvement in secondary associations.

Empirical studies of election campaigns reveal that limited shifts in political attitudes and in actual voting behavior take place in a given election campaign. But this limited amount of change is clearly crucial in determining the outcome. The research literature supports the  proposition that long-term political socialization has greater impact than the communication blitz  in a given political campaign. Both long-term and short-term mass media communicatino and party organization are key variables in both maintaining and molding political opinions. The notion of “the politics of mass society” (Kornhauser 1959) proposes that community and associational affiliations are getting weak in determiniing political decisions of individuals and activities of the party organizations and the mass media communications are getting stronger.

Political Institutions - Political Parties


Elite analysis

Gaetano Mosca (1896) and Robert Michels (1911) served as central figures in stimulating empirical studies of elites in the sociology of political organization. Political parties and their auxiliary institutions have been subject to various forms of empirical analysis. Typologies of party organization have been created, using such categories as “patronage,” “ideological,” “programmatic.”  The writings of the University of Chicago empirical school of political research, which included Charles Merriam, Harold Lasswell, and Harold Gosnell and which in turn came to be called political behavior research, were crucial in  study of party organizations (Gosnell 1927; Lasswell 1936). These studies focused on the effectiveness of differing types of party organization on the performance of such activities as the recruitment of new leaders, the posing of political alternatives, the maintenance of linkages between the electorate and the government bureaucracy, the mobilization of mass political participation, and the formulation of consent. The literature has  many detailed case studies of political parties and covers a wide range of political systems. Comparative analysis mainly takes the form of paired comparisons (as between, for example, the United States and the Soviet Union). Efforts to study the dilemmas facing similar groups of nations, such as the developing nations are also made.


In some studies,  the focal issue is the capacity of the economic and industrial sector to influence and control political decisions. There seems to be widespread agreement among political sociologists  that, with the growth of a complex division of labor, industrial and economic organizations are constricted in their capacity for direct management of the political process. The economic leaders do not have the skills or programmatic approach to maintain complete dominance over the political party system, be it a single-party or a multiparty structure. The separation of ownership from property control contributes to this process. The development of trade union organizations often serves as a countervailing force to the political power of owners and managers of economic organization in those societies where labor unions are autonomous organizations. Institutional analysis also points  to the growth of professional associations developing their ability to exercise political power in the name of both science and public welfare. Large governmental bureaucracies are also developing into important players in the political system.

Paralleling the role played by economic institutions is the role of the military. The military have considerable actual and potential power because of the vast resources they command and because of the fundamental importance of national security.  Political sociologists have sought to describe and account for the various forms of political balance which operate between modern political parties and the military. There is hardly a society in which the military do not have some political power. The influence of the military varies from that of a pressure group to that of an active coalition partner in the domestic political structure.

There has been a growth of professional and voluntary associations that tend to accumulate political power, and these organizations have been studied, on a selective case study basis, as examples of pressure groups. The social structure of an industrial society or one in the process of modernization produces a variety of groups, such as old-age, youth, and ethnic, cultural, and religious associations, which generate political demands through their associational representatives. In a multiparty system these pressure groups seek direct access to the parliamentarians and administrative leaders and tend to weaken the party.


Modern elites tend increasingly to be selected by criteria of achievement rather than on the basis of inherited social background, and as a result they tend to be recruited from broader and broader social strata.

The literature of national power structures tends to focus on the analysis of specific elite groups. In particular, there are available a series of national studies in depth which deal with the recruitment and socialization of the parliamentary elites. In addition, attention has been paid on a comparative basis to the differing patterns of pressure groups, especially economic pressure groups, in influencing the political process.

 In the analysis of the United States political system, the residues of economic determinism are to be found in C. Wright Mills’s “power elite” concept (1956), in which the political  leadership is seen as a group of a capitalists whose actions and attitudes are  transformed, in part, by the pressures of international relations.  The leadership consists of people recruited from in the industrial/service and military sectors and the professional political elite. The economic elites are the dominant group and they fuse with the military, while the political elites have secondary and circumscribed roles.

By contrast, a variety of writers, including Robert Dahl, Talcott Parsons, Daniel Bell, and Morris Janowitz, identify a bargaining model in the United States, characterized by a more pluralistic pattern of political power. The elites are seen to be drawn from much more differentiated groups and subject to a system of countervailing checks and balances. In this approach,  the basic political issue of interest is not so much the arbitrary exercise of power by a small, integrated elite as it is the necessity of creating conditions under which a differentiated elite can make effective decisions. In the United States, according to the analysis of Shils (1956) and others, elite integration presents special problems because the creative role of the politician is not adequately understood and the respect accorded him by the other elite sectors and by the electorate at large is relatively low and unstable.

Empirical research into elite structures has distinguished between local—community, metropolitan, and regional—elites and national elite systems. In the United States both the power elite concept and the bargaining model highlight the separation of economic power and political elites at the local level. A rich body of historical and analytical material describes the process of “bifurcation” of local elites in the United States. According to the power elite model, this is the result of a shift of political interest to the national arena; for the bargaining model, it is the outgrowth of the process of “democratization,” which brings representatives of ethnic, religious, and lower-status groups into political power.

Comparative Studies of Nations

Joseph Schumpeter, in Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1942), developed a comprehensive and generic analysis of the social and political institutions on which capitalism was based. His ideas about the transformation of entrepreneurial activities into a large-scale organization format, the negative role of intellectuals in the politics of capitalism, and the decline of representative institutions have been seminal formulations.


The central issue in the study of new nations after independence hinges on the limitations and actual breakdown of multiparty systems in supplying the political leadership necessary for economic and social development. Scholarly writing in this area has passed from a focus on individual case studies to a variety of types of comparative analysis. One approach is that found in Edward Shils’s Political Development in the New States (1959–1960), where he presents a series of generalized governmental types, such as traditional oligarchies and modernizing oligarchies, and analyzes their political dilemmas. Gabriel A. Almond and James S. Coleman, in The Politics of the Developing Areas (1960), follow a similar approach, but they make use of statistical indicators to explain these types of political regimes. Alternatively, comparative analysis has been pursued by exploring specific hypotheses related to a particular institution, such as the governmental bureaucracy or economic enterprise. An example of this approach is Morris Janowitz’ The Military in the Political Development of New Nations (1964), in which the limitations on the capacity of the military to supply political leadership are in part accounted for in terms of internal organizational and professional factors.

A fully comprehensive approach to comparative political sociology must encompass the distinction between industrialized and nonindustrialized nations. Such work has been stimulated partly by the desire to make use of the data that are available and to produce quantitative comparisons and findings even though the problems of the validity of international statistical sources and the comparability of survey findings have not been solved. Karl Deutsch and his associates are representative of the efforts to uncover patterns of political behavior through refined statistical analysis of the standard census-type data for all the political divisions of the world. By contrast, more selectively and intensively, Almond and Verba (1963) have employed survey research techniques in countries of Europe and in Mexico to probe both political participation and socialization of fundamental political values.


The development of the “behavioral persuasion” in the study of politics does in fact encourage a focus on routine and ongoing processes, rather than on crises and decision-making points. But, there is a body of monographic literature which describes the outbreaks of political conflict—when the pursuit of group interest leads to action outside the institutionalized forms of political change. This type of phenomenological research has come to encompass the full range of politics, from community conflict to relations between nations. Social-psychological approaches derived from the study of collective behavior or collective problem solving have been employed to handle these empirical materials. The sources of political conflict and the means by which consensus is created are central issues for political sociologists.


Political Sociology's Role in Political Theory



It is only since the end of World War II, that some political sociologists have become interested in theoretical formulations which explore explicitly the conditions under which political democracy would be maximized. Political sociology has the goal of formulating social, psychological, and economic conditions under which political democracy would be maximized. Some theorists, as represented by Schumpeter, hold that elections are the hallmark of democratic society and that, therefore, the study  of the election process is a key task of sociological research. Others, such as Robert Dahl and Charles Lindblom, are concerned with the formulation of criteria which encompass the practices of administrative and community agencies.  Political sociology is also concerned with the analysis of the economic, social, and psychological preconditions for political democracy.


The article, initially  is a modified version of:
http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-reform/sociology-general-terms-and-concepts-20

Visit for References and Bibliography
http://nraosskc.blogspot.com/2013/07/political-sociology.html


Political Sociology: a New Grammar of Politics
By Ali Ashraf, L N Sharma
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=PPqU94mWQo0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false


Political Sociology - Lecture Notes
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~nuff0084/polsoc/

Political Sociology - Introduction
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~nuff0084/polsoc/PolSocIntroLecture.pdf


Thursday, February 16, 2017

Political Sociology



Keith Faulks (2000) defines political sociology as follows:

"At its broadest level, political sociology is concerned with the relationship between politics and society. Its distinctiveness within the social sciences lies in its acknowledgement that political actors, including parties, pressure groups and social movements, operate within a wider social context. Political actors therefore inevitably shape, and in turn are shaped by, social structures such as gender, class and nationality. Such social structures ensure that political influence within society is unequal. It follows from this that a key concept in political sociology is that power, where power is defined as the capacity to achieve one's objectives even when those objectives are in conflict with the interests of another actor. Political sociologists therefore invariably return to the following question: which individuals and groups in society possess the capacity to pursue their interests, and how is this power exercised and institutionalized."

Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction (Paperback) by Keith Faulks
http://www.amazon.com/Political-Sociology-A-Critical-Introduction/dp/0814727093
(Preview facility is there)


LSE (London School of Economics) - M.Sc. - Political Sociology



Political Sociology - Bibliography

Allardt, Erik; and Littunen, YrjoÖ (editors) 1964 Cleavages, Ideologies and Party Systems: Contributions to Comparative Political Sociology. Transactions of the Westermarck Society, Vol. 10. Helsinki: The Society.


Almond, Gabriel A.; and Verba, Sidney 1963 The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton Univ. Press.


Dahl, Robert A. (1961) 1963 Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.


Duverger, Maurice (1951) 1962 Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. 2d English ed., rev. New York: Wiley; London: Methuen. → First published in French.

Key, V. O. Jr. 1961 Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.

Kornhauser, William 1959 The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, III.; Free Press.

Lasswell, Harold D. 1936 Politics: Who Gets What, When, How? New York: McGraw-Hill.


Lipset, Seymour M. 1960 Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Marx, Karl (1852) 1964 The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers. → First published in German. A paperback edition was published in 1964.

Marx, Karl; and Engels, Friedrich (1845–1846) 1939 The German Ideology. Parts 1 and 3. With an introduction by R. Pascal. New York: International Publishers. → The full text was first published in 1932 as Die deutsche Ideologic and republished by Dietz Verlag in 1953.

Michels, Robert (1911) 1959 Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Dover. → First published as Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modemen Demokratie. A paperback edition was published in 1962 by Collier.

Mills, C. Wright 1956 The Power Elite. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.


Mosca, Gaetano (1896) 1939 The Ruling Class (Elementi di scienza politica). New York: McGraw-Hill

Neumann, Franz (1942) 1963 Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933–1944. 2d ed. New York: Octagon Books.

Rokkan, Stein (editor) 1962 Approaches to the Study of Political Participation. Ada sociologica 6, no. 1/2.


Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942) 1950 Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3d ed. New York: Harper; London: Allen & Unwin. → A paperback edition was published by Harper in 1962.


Weber, Max (1919) 1946 Politics as a Vocation. Pages 77–128 in Max Weber, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Translated and edited by Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Weber, Max (1921) 1946 Class, Status, Party. Pages 180–195 in Max Weber, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Translated and edited by Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Updated on 19 February 2017,  20 July 2013